"Oh, guess who got engaged!"
"Who?"
"My friend Zahraa! Remember her?"
For two ladies from Jordan, the above is understood within a certain context. But if the reader is from Egypt, for example, he or she might have a different understanding.
There is a certain understanding for the process of marriage in the light of the Sharia. This understanding has been carried and colored with traditional colors throughout the Muslim nations, which resulted in some difference when you consider different Muslim nations.
In Sahria: Engagement, or "Khitbah", is a promise of marriage. This happens after the proposer expresses his desire of getting married to a certain lady, and then -after her permission and on behalf of her- her "wali" answers the propose of her approval and promises him to get united with her through marriage, that is, of course, if they got to know each other and got along.
At this stage, and after the "khitbah" is initiated, the proposer can meet with the potential bride and sit with her and get to know her, but she is not yet committed to him through a contract. She cannot be with him alone in complete isolation (khulwah), but, of course, it is ok to sit with him in some privacy, but to an extent that does not allow any thing to go wrong. If they want to go out in the world, some one should accompany them. And -according to alot of scholars- she cannot take off her hijab in front of him, though she can wear a less strict hijab (but still cover all of her body except for the face and hands).
When the bride and groom are ready to be officially committed to one another comes the marriage contract. Here, the two would pronounce the specific wording on the contract in front of a group of people, not less than two witnesses. And they sign the contract. In sharia, at this stage they are officially married. He is hers and she is his. She can go out with him alone, she can be alone with him in isolation, she can take off her hijab in front of him (he is allowed to look at her body and she is allowed to look at his), and they are ready to commence the marriage through the first marital intercourse. There are minor differences between the status of the marriage before and after the first marital intercourse, like for example the "iddah" is not required if a divorce occurred before it, but is required if a divorce occurs after the first marital intercourse. There are several other differences but I think they are sort of minor.
In different societies the word "engagement" or "khitbah" has different meanings.
Here, in Jordan, for example, what sharia considers as "khitbah" exists as only a couple of brief visits, after which the bride is required to decide if she wants to go on or not. If she says yes, a ceremony of initiating the marriage contract is held, and usually this is what is called "khitbah" in Jordan. The bride and groom would be kept in a liquid status that is between married people and engaged people until the wedding is held. This period of time may extend to a year or couple of years, in which the bride and groom are allowed to do whatever they want except an intercourse (the thing that causes alot of serious problems between the bride and groom on one side, and the bride and her family on another side). After the wedding is held, and the bride and groom go to their house after the wedding party, they have their first marital intercourse.
For us as Circassians, things are alittle bit similar. However, we do have the practice that exists in Sharia under "khitbah", but we call it a Circassian name "psathekhu" which means searching for the soul. In the modern youth's dictionary, this is called having a boyfriend / girlfriend! :-| That's why to alot of people who do not know what we mean by this, think that when our youth have boyfriends/girlfriends they are missing around with the opposite sex and that we -as Circassians- are not conservative people. Although the fact is a boyfriend in our conception is no more that a "Fiance" or "Khateeb" in the Islamic perspective! :-)
So, my dear friend Kanumommy, back to my friend's story...
Her "Fiance" was in fact her husband though a marriage contract, with whom she did not commence her marriage through a marital intercourse. And in order to end that contract they had to go through a divorce or a khula :-)


